<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very Small shootout:  DeDuplication (NetApp) vs. Compression (vRanger Pro)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mainesysadmin.com/2008/07/31/very-small-shootout-deduplication-netapp-vs-compression-vranger-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mainesysadmin.com/2008/07/31/very-small-shootout-deduplication-netapp-vs-compression-vranger-pro/</link>
	<description>SysAdmin in Maine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://mainesysadmin.com/2008/07/31/very-small-shootout-deduplication-netapp-vs-compression-vranger-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainesysadmin.com/?p=97#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I ran across this a bit back and wanted to look into the compression setting with backup exec and dedup as well as try to address the multiple backups of the same data.  I ended up doing a somewhat similar test to yours though and posted the results here: http://danstechnotes.blogspot.com/2009/11/netapp-and-backup-exec-compression-vs.html

Figured I&#039;d share the link.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I ran across this a bit back and wanted to look into the compression setting with backup exec and dedup as well as try to address the multiple backups of the same data.  I ended up doing a somewhat similar test to yours though and posted the results here: <a href="http://danstechnotes.blogspot.com/2009/11/netapp-and-backup-exec-compression-vs.html" rel="nofollow">http://danstechnotes.blogspot.com/2009/11/netapp-and-backup-exec-compression-vs.html</a></p>
<p>Figured I&#8217;d share the link.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin76</title>
		<link>http://mainesysadmin.com/2008/07/31/very-small-shootout-deduplication-netapp-vs-compression-vranger-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainesysadmin.com/?p=97#comment-268</guid>
		<description>This should not be so surprising. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should not be so surprising. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://mainesysadmin.com/2008/07/31/very-small-shootout-deduplication-netapp-vs-compression-vranger-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainesysadmin.com/?p=97#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree with you about the more data thrown into deduplication the better the results will be.  From my testing I was unable to get A-SIS to deduplicate compressed archives; so vRanger must be used with the -nozip option for A-SIS to work correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree with you about the more data thrown into deduplication the better the results will be.  From my testing I was unable to get A-SIS to deduplicate compressed archives; so vRanger must be used with the -nozip option for A-SIS to work correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://mainesysadmin.com/2008/07/31/very-small-shootout-deduplication-netapp-vs-compression-vranger-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainesysadmin.com/?p=97#comment-127</guid>
		<description>The benefits of de-duplication will be more evident as the dedupe target sees the data over and over through the backup process.  The best combination would be to use a Netapp volume that  has A-SIS enabled as the target for the vRanger backups, then I think you&#039;d really start to see some compression numbers.  This is how other de-dupe vendors advertise 20:1 compression ratios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The benefits of de-duplication will be more evident as the dedupe target sees the data over and over through the backup process.  The best combination would be to use a Netapp volume that  has A-SIS enabled as the target for the vRanger backups, then I think you&#8217;d really start to see some compression numbers.  This is how other de-dupe vendors advertise 20:1 compression ratios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
